Ordinarily, I am dismissive of those who lament technology’s effects on
our previously “untainted” lives. My response to those who wax nostalgic about
pen-and-ink letters and how e-mail doesn’t reflect tone and nuance (and ink on
paper does?) is “Get over it”. However, there’s one phenomenon to which I have
a visceral opposition: the
media circus surrounding college graduations. Well, not all college
graduations, as none but the local press are covering 90% thereof. I’m talking
about the top colleges, i.e., the Ivy League and the second tier.
We see here, in
fact, that through the 1990s, U. of Michigan’s commencement speakers were
either past or present officeholders, educators, or esteemed journalists. But
scroll up to 2009 and 2013, and who do we see? The CEOs of Google and Twitter,
respectively. We see here
that in the 41 years 1972-2013, 19 of Northfield Mount Hermon’s speakers, i.e.,
nearly half, were alums. Totally appropriate. In this
list from Syracuse University, we see that the first TV personality showed
up in 1980, and it was the host of a PBS news program. But from 1994 onward,
and especially from 2000, we see the glitz becoming more and more prominent.
These are just a few lists reflecting the trend.
Pre-Internet, there was college bookstore merch. Sure, you wore your
crimson / blue hoodie and your car sported your Harvard / Yale bumper sticker. You
were signaling, or perhaps you just liked the hoodie, but it was an individual,
unmediated affair. Sure the New York Times reported on commencement
keynote speakers, but it wasn’t splashed across the front page and trumpeted for
weeks on end.
Now, however, from March through May, you can hardly open your browser
without seeing “who’s speaking at which commencement”. It’s signaling on steroids, and it gets
more frenzied every year. I propose a mass “mental boycott” of the hoopla. You attend
a selective school? Good for you. Wear your hoodie with pride. Your school has
glitzy alums? Great. Invite ‘em back for commencement and award ‘em an honorary
degree. But please, leave the rest of us out of it. We Officially Don’t Care.
Maybe the glitz is an incentive for graduates to attend the ceremonies? You can always get your diploma by mail. Maybe attendance is down without celebrities?
ReplyDeleteGood points, Mollie. I just interpreted it as "Look at us; look at how elite we are. Nya nya nya." But yeah, I can see that it's a way to attract an audience. Otherwise graduations are long and boring, and parents drive for hours / fly / stay one or more nights in a motel so they might as well get to hear a glitzy speaker. Got it.
ReplyDelete