It isn’t often that I blog first thing in the morning, but this news item has me so riled I won’t get any paid work done ‘til I’m finished sounding off. Imagine:
An Arab posed as a Jew so he could get a woman in bed. Oops! Honey, be more careful who you have sex with within minutes of knowing him. Well, apparently she hasn’t moved on: She pressed charges of rape and indecent assault (whatever that is; I suspect it’s a fancy term for miscegenation). But wait, it gets better: A judge actually agreed to hear the case. The verdict: The man was sentenced to 18 months in prison.
I call “racism”, and I don’t use that term lightly (I prefer “bigotry”, as “racism” is a victim of word inflation). But beyond the racism, thinly veiled as “protecting the public interest” (according to Jerusalem District Court Judge Tzvi Segal), why is there not a hue and cry from the legal community? This case should be published in the law school textbooks as the example of abuse of the justice system. The defendant has been under house arrest, wearing an electronic cuff, for two years. Show me a Jew in the same situation who would be thus detained. Not to mention the fact that the courts are overloaded and don’t have the resources to hear actual cases of injustice, for instance, those of women who suffer violence at the hands of their mates, or minors at the hands of their parents.
Thank goodness for the sane voices of Dr. Elkana Leist of the Public Defender and Judge Emeritus of Tel Aviv District Court Shelly Teiman. To paraphrase the former, while the defendant was perhaps a sleazeball, the courts don’t exist to protect us from sleaziness. Now is every woman whose sexual partner told her he’s rich when he’s not, going to file a rape-by-deception complaint? Aladdin and Jasmine, anyone?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Maybe he tossed his shoes at a judge in his haste to undress... most actual rapes don't get 3.5 years of time served.
ReplyDeleteAnd did you see what the judges said about him rehabilitating himself after his particular crime? Do you think that means he will avoid sex with Jewish women hereafter?
I cringe at the frivolity of the blog title. Nuremberg-type laws– or legal rulings– are a very serious matter in the history of a nation-state. It's clear that the animating factor here is not the sex, it’s the despised ethnicity of the poser and his fradulent claim to be a member of a different (more accepted) ethnicity. Sure there are outcries. But the ruling of even a single court suggests that Ya’acov Crow laws– and attitudes– have penetrated very, very deep. Doesn’t anyone see that it’s going to be very hard to turn this around?
ReplyDeleteI have the same gut reaction as you do to the case; but the fact is, both your end-of-posting tag ("Now is every woman whose sexual partner told her he's rich when he's not...") and the general message - that this is all or mostly about racism - are a bit off-base.
ReplyDeleteThe precedent allowing Jasmine to press charges against Aladdin was already in place in Israel long before this case (see the case of Oren ben Avraham, mentioned in the same article). The courts were willing to make this same ridiculous and paternalistic ruling against Jews as well - and note that the deceptions involved in this case (for example, marital status) are not limited to ethnicity. Possibly the woman involved would not have gone so far as to press charges if it was a Jewish married man pretending to be single and looking for a lasting relationship - I can attest to that level of racism in Israeli society. But if such charges had been pressed against a Jewish man, I think the courts would likely have made the same ruling and reinforced the same precedent.
Yup, you said it.
ReplyDeleteThen again, think of the possibilities. If the woman told the guy, "Of course I'm on the pill," or presented herself as being 21 when she's really 42, could he accuse her of rape?
yam - i think you're way off base with this one. the fact that he is an arab is the minor point. the major one is that he is married and presented himself as single, interested in a romantic relationship. he broke the law by seeking and obtaining sexual favors (services?)by decpetive means. the woman's case - while she can be faulted for all kinds of things - is that she went to bed with him because she thought it might lead to a real relationship... had she known he was married - she wouldn't have. the press of course are blowing upthe arab-jew part - but in presenting himself as married he violates what seems to me a very good law preventing predatory males from using all kinds of means, not only physical violence on unsuspecting females.
ReplyDeletegood call, judges...
Thanks for posting this; I discovered it through South Jerusalem. When racism structured life, it is not called racism, but necessity. This land has a terrible confrontation ahead.
ReplyDeleteJeremy, while you present your argument well, and it does have merit, do you see where this ruling could lead? Not only was the ruling both paternalistic and racist (how dare those yucky Arabs try -- by any means, either honest or deceptive -- to touch "our women"), but again -- is it the job of the justice system to protect us from slimeballs?
ReplyDeleteמילים כדורבנות.
ReplyDeleteבתקופה האחרונה אני עוסקת באינטנסיביות בפעילות למניעת תקיפה מינית וטיפול בנפגעות. תלונה כזו היא לעג לנשים הסובלות סבל אמיתי. היא מחבלת באופן חמור במאבק לבלימת עברייני מין של ממש ולפיכך פוגעת מאוד בכל איש ואשה, ילד וילדה - כי כולנו קורבנות אפשריים של אנסים אמיתיים.
רק לידיעתך:
ReplyDelete> זה בדיוק מה שנשים עושות כשגבר מעמיד פנים
> שהוא טייס/מנתח פלסטי/מיליונר. "משטרה!"
> הזיכרון הקצר מפריע לך לזכור כתבות ארוכות
> על מיני מעמידי פנים סדרתיים שנתבעו וישבו.
> אנחנו ל א מתווכחים על העונש הלא מידתי שנגזר על גנב המשגלים;
> יהודי היה יוצא בפחות,
> בייחוד אם זו הייתה הרמאות הראשונה שלו.
כל העניין הזה, שבכלל לא גלגלו את הבחורה מכל המדרגות במשטרה כבר כשהיא באה להתלונן על "אונס":
ReplyDeleteמה קרה? יצאת עם גבר, החלטת להזדיין אתו, ומה זה חשוב מה הוא סיפר לך? ואם הוא היה אומר שהוא ברזילאי, עשיר ושיש לו מרצדס קופה בברזיל - והיה מתברר שזה לא כך - זה אונס??
והעובדה שעינוי הדין הזה נמשך כבר שנתיים -- זו בכלל שערורייה. ויותר משזו גזענות (מצד הבחורה, בעיקר), זו חוסר תשומת-לב מצד בית המשפט שבכלל אישר את קבלת התלונה וכתב האישום.
האם כבר לא ניתן להבחין בין עיקר וטפל, בין אמת לעלילה גזענית מטופשת?
I must admit, if this case weren't so sad it would be laughable, for several reasons.
ReplyDelete1. Let the buyer beware. The longer you know a liar, the easier you figure him/her out. While I am not judging this young lady on a moral standpoint, I am judging her for all sorts of stupid. She made (what was for her) an important decision within minutes. Bad idea for her.
2. What are the levels of lies that constitute rape? If a man were to have sex with a woman who has had secret and extensive plastic surgery, and the kids come out butt-ugly, can he cry rape? How about just a reductive nose job? Can he cry rape if the kids just have a huge honker? How about all those religious types that hide or refuse to diagnose mental illness in order to get their kids married off? Is that rape, too?
3. At what point does responsibility end? Isn't the woman an adult with reasoning skills of her own? Would the normal person expect honesty from a stranger enough to share bodily fluids with them based on easily hidden attributes? I mean most people don't have a flashing "Arab" or "Married" sign over their heads. These facts take some time to uncover.
4. I take this as different than drugging someone or physically assaulting them. In the former, the person's ability to reason is removed. In the latter, the person is denied choice. This woman had both the ability to reason, and the right to choose.
To anonymous. I hope you're joking. Women belong to themselves. If they want treif sausage they can bloody well have it. If they don't they need to take reasonable precautions, like know someone more than 15 minutes.
Well, that was my 2 cents. Oh, and why do I feel that this guy's wife is the real victim here? Her husband is a jerk, and now is in jail, leaving her with two kids to support.
mla, I think you've given the most reasoned argument so far against calling this case rape. Well done and thanks for commenting.
ReplyDelete